Last night’s stuck song made me remember something that I have always wished would be pursued. Drug education usually amounts to an explanation of the drug (active ingredients, addiction method, etc.) and an admonition to stay away from them. Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” campaign is probably the best example of ridiculous drug education. She tells you what to do, but not why. So when pressure, or desire comes up, there is no defense.
“Berry” and “Loaded” (see here for explanation) are possibly good examples of how drug education should be. If you can actually show kids what happens when you decide to do that, it will have a much greater impact than just telling them. In my mind, the biggest deterrents to drug use are the drug users themselves. I have seen countless clips of famous rock and roll types under the influence of various things, and they are all wretched. The interview of Sid vicious in his bed with Nancy is a classic. He actually falls asleep in the middle of a sentence, lets his cigarette drop out of his mouth and burns her. The Red Hot Chile Pepper’s guitarist gave an interview to a Dutch TV station while he was in the throes of heroin addiction. They ask him why he does heroin, and he replies that he needs some beauty in his life. The sight of this, obviously dying, man saying that he takes the thing that is killing him for beauty’s sake is really tough to watch. He eventually pulled out of it BTW…
The best thing to show kids, and maybe even adults, is a show called “Intervention.” They show it on A&E or maybe the Learning Channel. They follow a drug addict around, show him/her doing drugs and what they have to do each day to get through. This is key, they actually show the needle going into the vein and the resulting track marks. They show how the alcoholic mother has to stop and get a drink all day long, they show the woman selling herself in order to pay for her habit. You also get to see people under the influence, and it’s always sad and terrible. You gotta bring this stuff home if it’s going to have an effect. They then show the intervention by the friends and families. That’s pretty awful. It isn’t enough to show what drugs do to you, you have to see what they do to everyone else. I’ve been told that that is a classic problem with addiction, you are unaware and/or don’t care what kind of effect that you have on others. It’s important to see that before you start down that road. They then show the aftermath of the intervention. On the show, most people agree to go to rehab, but not all do. Some are even given the option of rehab or jail, and they choose jail. Once again, it’s important to see how crazy you can get when in the grips of this stuff. The ones that do accept going to rehab never have an easy time. On the show, most relapse and either have to go back to rehab, or they live with the consequences.
I can’t help but think that his approach would be much more successful, and certainly more humane than the current “war on drugs” that we have right now. Many people feel that throwing these people into prison “for their own good” will somehow help them. They also feel that the best deterrence is the fear of incarceration. I humbly (ha!) suggest that it is not working, it has never worked, and something else needs to be tried. This would be a pretty easy (and cheap) effort, why not give it a try?